Jennifer Nicholson Geller, San Clemente

If you’re not outraged by the future extension of the 241 Toll Road because you “don’t get involved in politics” or “it will never happen,” it is time to reconsider. This isn’t a game of politics but your quality of living, your children’s health and your home values are at stake. The threat is real and the Transportation Corridor Agencies (TCA) is moving forward.

Toll roads in Orange County have never served the vast majority of motorists, only those who can afford to pay. Did you know we (through Caltrans) are footing the ongoing maintenance bill for these roads that most of us don’t or can’t use? We were duped into paying for the toll roads through development fees, loss of open space and public lands, in addition to some of the highest tolls in the country. Due to TCA mismanagement and faulty projections, these roads may never be free as they were ultimately intended.

Now, the TCA wants to bulldoze through our town. Although they deny having chosen a specific route, there is no denying that their efforts are locked on a proposed route that would wind straight through the center of town. This route would destroy thousands of homes, divide our city and come dangerously close to parks and schools. Most visible would be its encroachment on and over San Clemente High School. The toll road will blaze through miles of the city’s open space. The TCA has been secretive and dishonest in their attempt to push their road through, strategically pitting us against other groups.
Although their 2016 settlement with the Surfrider Foundation and the Save San Onofre Coalition “saved” Trestles, the foundation made a sour deal, agreeing not to take a position on any future proposed routes. This effectively pushed the TCA back to reconsider the San Clemente route that they themselves had rejected years earlier due to the destructiveness of the route.

There has been an amazing groundswell of support from local citizens and public officials to stop the toll road, but it is still very much a David-versus-Goliath effort. Educate yourself, write a letter, display a lawn sign, donate to www.gofundme.com/stop-the-toll-road.

About The Author Staff

comments (15)

  • Well said. If you want to save the best beach town in California for your kids, get in the fight.

    • Ms Geller wrote a pretty good letter–

      HOWEVER, Surfrider Foundation did not make a “sour” deal at all. For SF to
      have taken a stand on future inland alignments would have been flat unlawful– end of story. SF is a 501 c 3 non profit that is tax exempt and is required by law to stay strictly within their mission statement which is pure surf zone and coastal. If they had of taken a stand on other alignments it would be considered an “unrelated business expense” and have violated fed tax law.

      SF is over a quarter century old and populated by thoughtful and competent lawyers and scientists. They don’t make this sort of mistake— ever.

      • That’s right, Surfrider took into consideration “pure surf zone and coastal” only, not the San Clemente residents. Anyone in these closed-door meetings could have told San Clemente city what was happening, and what was going to happen to them. They didn’t.

        And if Surfrider is worried about the coast only, why does the “avoidance zone” stretch almost to Riverside County? Weak sauce, Rick.

        • Cord— all i can tell you is that the Fed law on the matter is very clear—and a coastal non profit works inland on pol development issues at their peril. SF’s primary mission was to protect the beach, and by all accounts did a magnificent job on saving Trestles! Over the years, different special interests have tried to pull SF off mission, luckily they resist it.

          • Trestles is a hollow victory if San Clemente is ruined. It’s also a hollow victory if radioactive waste continues to be stored at our beach. We want NONE of it. And of course we don’t want Trestles touched. NO MORE TOLL ROADS anywhere, not just near Trestles.

            Think bigger picture…

          • Agree on the nuke waste dump in the Sano bluff! I’m pretty sure SF has taken a strong position against it!
            Hollow victory saving trestles?
            Lmao— hardly.
            These fights are won, one victory at a time, all are important. “Losing” San Clemente is
            Of course bad in the extreme, but none of blame lays at SF’s feet. All they have done is rack up coastal environmental victories for 30 plus years!

            Your argument is similar to Trump blaming the FBI for Russian collusion/conspiracy…. never —- always a losing argument.

            Peter Douglas, the late and wonderful inventor of our Coastal Commission once famously noted that the California coast will always need saving”, SF has been a leader in that fight for 35 years!

          • Saving Trestles by abandoning San Clemente is a hollow victory. If your Trestles victory causes anguish for an entire community, is it really a victory? We need SF to fight against the toll roads for Trestles AND for San Clemente. We’ve got beaches here too, and folks who are extremely concerned about the runoff situation, land re-mitigation, and a host of other items that were swept aside with your settlement. Are you ready to abandon one stretch of coastline for another?

          • Well, I guess you’ve decided not to listen to me? That’s ok. As I’ve said, in order to keep the 501 c3 status and be legal, SF like all non profits, must stay within their federally registered mission and as much as you don’t like it, inland toll roads are not within it. You can hope SF takes on many fights but outside it’s mission and in violation of federal law, it just ain’t going to happen. That’s not for profit mal practice.

            I guess if you want you can promote squabbles among enviro non profits, you’re the TCA’s new best friend amigo.

          • Seriously? SC has beaches too. That’s not within your mandate? That’s why I mentioned runoff and re-mitigation of mitigated lands. Ever see those signs that say “drains to the ocean’?

            Stay within your mandated 501-C3 status. Your actions by doing so have thrown San Clemente under the bus. If you can’t see, then we’re both wasting our time.

          • Ok Cord I’ll try to help you understand thus.

            In order for SF to lawfully be in the Trestles fight the facts had to include a direct surf zone issue. They did.

            The alignment then in question, had a fly over that went directly over the trestles beach and swamp area.

            Surfrider foundation used a large team of scientists including hydrologists, oceanographers, coastal reef experts, and surfing experts, to explain again in a direct way how the flyover would impinge on the actual surf break. Meaning, The actual cobble reef that is “uppers”.

            This direct nexus in combination with published federal case law enabled Surfrider foundation to cite a specific established published legal precedent in order to be allowed into the fight and still protect their nonprofit status.

            Short of all of that direct effect on the actual reef in question, the foundation had no ability to act whatsoever. I was a volunteer and watched this for decades.

            Trying to use only urban runoff as a sole factor in allowing a particular campaign to fall within a mission statement, is very weak. If that was the case then Surfrider foundation or any other coastal zone management nonprofit could be engaged in any number of inland transportation political disputes. I can tell you my friend it just doesn’t work that way.

            However, there are many other nonprofits can crossover it and make that reach because their mission statement is more broadly defined. In fact as other local residents have done, you can start your own nonprofit and set up your own specific mission statement.

            If you set that mission statement up to encompass the TCA fight, you will find that other citizens will try to pull you into every other conceivable fight to “save San Clemente”. Like for instance, they will complain to you that you should be opposing the construction of the outlet mall, or it’s signage, or some shop on Delmar Street because it’s near the ocean.

            I hope that helps you understand.

          • Yep, got it. Understood before the explanation. Your “flyover” over the beach is a bit of a stretch, but I’ll let that slide.

            When you and your cohorts fashioned a solution with the TCA, you didn’t tell anyone about it. No public comment. Nothing. That’s not quite right. Perhaps you should bring in the people you’re purporting to help.

            Next, you solution created an “avoidance area” that went nearly all the way up to Riverside County. Your beach team did this. You say you can’t, but you did. YOUR avoidance area means that the TCA can either dug under San Clemente or blow through it. They seem to think that a toll road is the solution to every problem, so we’re now dealing with their “ultimate solution.” Thank you.

            Next time you craft a “solution” during litigation, find out if the neighbors you’re trying to help actually want it. Jeez…to think that SF was actually founded in San Clemente, and here you are trying to destroy it.

  • I’ll let you enjoy the last word and leave you with this. I was only a volunteer. A local resident citizen during this fight and the marine Corp housing fight on SM Point.
    I did feel that SF was and is in quite competent hands. I have since moved to parts south. When you advise that next time SF should check with the neighbors you really betray that you truly don’t understand what happened and frankly what is happening. The fight that culminated in the huge victory for the coast WAS in totality ONLY a fight led and populated by locals in SC, period! This was all neighbors amigo.Thats how SF works.

    I actually enjoyed reading you alternative facts! The TCA loves you. Since you’ve been so free with advice for me, let me give you some; keep your eye on the prize, build a huge coalition of “people power” and press on to fight the monstrosity that is the TCA. Tearing down successful coalitions who won victory in the recent and distant past only helps our opponents. But my guess is that you’ll have to learn that the hard way….

  • I’ll let you enjoy the last word and leave you with this. I was only a volunteer. A local resident citizen during this fight and the marine Corp housing fight on SM Point.
    I did feel that SF was and is in quite competent hands. I have since moved to parts south. When you advise that next time SF should check with the neighbors you really betray that you truly don’t understand what happened and frankly what is happening. The fight that culminated in the huge victory for the coast WAS in totality ONLY a fight led and populated by locals in SC, period! This was all neighbors amigo.Thats how SF works.

    I actually enjoyed reading you alternative facts! The TCA loves you. Since you’ve been so free with advice for me, let me give you some; keep your eye on the prize, build a huge coalition of “people power” and press on to fight the monstrosity that is the TCA. Tearing down suchcessful coalitions who won victory in the recent and distant past only helps our opponents. But my guess is that you’ll have to learn that the hard way….

    Oh…. and SF wasn’t founded in SC little buddy!

  • My bad…you’re only headquartered in SC. You started in Maleeboo. It’s best to stop because you continue to not answer my questions, and can’t admit that SF threw SC under the bus with the secret settlement.

    Last, I’d rather tear down your coalition than have it tear down San Clemente. We’ll save Trestles, AND San Clemente. Thanks for nothing.

    • Ya see Cord, when you mess up basic facts like—

      How SF and SC citizens worked together to stop an alignment

      What the settlement agreement means

      How you clearly don’t understand how it is that our tax laws work

      Lmao, and even where SF was founded, that was fun

      I could go on….

      Why do you think I’d believe any answer I gave you would be met with anything more than the public ignorance you’re displaying here?

      Is this the best you can do for the Final word? Come on now—- please try harder,
      I mean people are counting on you! You apparently didn’t lift a finger to stop the TCA wreck SC last time, you’re going to do better than this when YOU try to stop an alignment, right?

comments (15)

Your email address will not be published.

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>