The article you’re about to read is from our reporters doing their important work — investigating, researching, and writing their stories. We want to provide informative and inspirational stories that connect you to the people, issues and opportunities within our community. Journalism requires lots of resources. Today, our business model has been interrupted by the pandemic; the vast majority of our advertisers’ businesses have been impacted. That’s why the SC Times is now turning to you for financial support. Learn more about our new Insider’s program here. Thank you.

File photo
File photo

By Allison Jarrell

After much debate and heated public comment, the Capistrano Unified School District Board of Trustees voted 5-2 Wednesday night to approve an Aug. 22 start date for the 2017-2018 academic calendar.

CUSD students began school early this year on Aug. 25 following a March 2015 vote by the district board to adjust the academic calendar. The board also voted at that time to begin the upcoming 2016-2017 year on Aug. 15.

Those calendar approvals drew vocal opposition from some parents who criticized the lack of input and reasoning for the switch. The board responded to that criticism by forming a School Calendar Committee tasked with making a recommendation for the 2017-2018 academic calendar. The 37-member committee engaged residents with three public forums, input collected via email and a phone survey of 436 CUSD families. Their recommendations to the board were centered around educational programs, student holidays and consistency from year to year.

The Calendar Committee proposed four options for the 2017-2018 calendar Wednesday night: Option A: Aug. 15-May 31, Option B: Aug. 22-June 7, Option C: Aug. 28-June 13, and Option D: Sept. 5-June 20. Staff did not endorse Option D and recommended the board approve Option B.

“We believe this is a compromise for the parents and families who have expressed their desire for a post-labor day start,” Vital said, adding that polls showed 75 percent of respondents were satisfied with this year’s Aug. 25 start date.

Trustee Gary Pritchard moved to adopt Option C—Aug. 28 start date—with Trustee John Alpay seconding to continue the discussion. That motion failed 5-2. Trustee Jim Reardon later moved to approve staff’s recommendation, Option B—Aug. 22 start date—with Trustee Gila Jones seconding. That motion passed 5-2 with Alpay and Trustee Lynn Hatton-Hodson dissenting.

CUSD’s 2017-2018 school year is now set to start on Aug. 22, and the calendars for the 2018-2019 and 2019-2020 school years will follow the same model.

Trustworthy, accurate and reliable local news stories are more important now than ever. Support our newsroom by making a contribution and becoming a subscribing member today.

About The Author Staff

comments (3)

  • I do not understand the quote “we believe this is a compromise for the parents and families who have expressed their desire for a post-labor day start” yet the dismissal of option D which was the only option to support post labor-day start. The quote and article reads that the Board acknowledged the desire but dismissed it outright. I assume there is more to this. Can someone please explain?

    In addition, the non-dismissed options (A-C) are one week apart from each other. This could suggest that option B was always the plan and by surrounding it with A & C it would look like B would be the sweet spot.

    I don’t understand the commotion of these dates that are so close together and why it is a big deal. However; I don’t trust the board either so always wonder what games are played. The lack of trust comes from many observations over the last several years.

    Any constructive comments would be apprecaited

    • The superintendent’s office only pretended to have the public way in as required. They are just doing whatever they want.

      Since districing was implemented for the school board trustees voters have had their representation reduced to one trustee which is not enough to enact any real presentation. We cannot hire or fire any of the other trustees. This division this caused limits voters ability to recall them like years past.

      We really need to reverse districting for the school board trustee elections.


  • First – Ms. Vitale we started on the 15th NOT the 25th. Second, this is NOT want teachers wanted, they as did the families wanted option D. Third, I wonder if you let anyone know Ms. Vitale if B was chosen that NO teacher would be paid for August Week or the June week. So now, our teachers are working for FREE for 2 weeks. As far as I am concerned until Ms. Vitale is removed from office there will be nothing “right” with this district.

comments (3)

Your email address will not be published.

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>