The article you’re about to read is from our reporters doing their important work — investigating, researching, and writing their stories. We want to provide informative and inspirational stories that connect you to the people, issues and opportunities within our community. Journalism requires lots of resources. Today, our business model has been interrupted by the pandemic; the vast majority of our advertisers’ businesses have been impacted. That’s why the SC Times is now turning to you for financial support. Learn more about our new Insider’s program here. Thank you.

By Shawn Raymundo

While the ongoing public health crisis is expected to cost the city of San Clemente about $2.5 million in general fund revenue for Fiscal Year 2019-2020, city officials expressed confidence that the fiscal year will close in June with minimal impact.

“I think it’s safe to say— and we can say with confidence—that we’ll be able to close out the current fiscal year with very little impact,” Assistant City Manager Erik Sund told the council on Tuesday, May 5.

According to the current fiscal year budget, the city is projected to collect about $67.6 million in general fund revenue, with $35.63 million (or roughly 53%) coming from property taxes. Another $10.13 million was projected come from sales taxes.

“Our revenue structure is very unique, and in this case, a good revenue structure,” Sund said of the city’s budget, adding that the city isn’t significantly dependent on sales taxes or transient occupancy taxes (TOT).

Financial Services Officer Jake Rahn told the council on Tuesday that while the city doesn’t expect to see any significant impacts to property-tax revenue this fiscal year, the effects of the pandemic on the revenue stream will likely be felt in Fiscal Year 2021-2022.

“Basically, we have another year out and should be able to get a better understanding of where things are at that time,” Rahn said.

Sund noted that though the city certainly expects there to be impacts related to the coronavirus pandemic, staff is “having a hard time forecasting or identifying those specific impacts.”

“We have had a meeting with our sales tax adviser, and they indicated that they, too, are still waiting to understand the true impacts,” Sund said.

City staff, he said, is expected to come back to the council during the May 19 meeting to present the latest quarterly report, which should provide a better picture on how sales-tax revenue will fare amid the crisis.

To cover costs related to locally addressing COVID-19, the council last month voted to reactivate a disaster relief fund, setting aside $500,000 from the city’s general fund and general liability fund.

According to Sund, the city has so far spent about $62,000 of those monies, which paid additional janitorial services such as deep cleaning and disinfecting public facilities, respirator supplies, sanitizer, gloves for field staff, barricades for closures and caution tape.

“And all of those are being tracked, because we will be submitting them for (federal) reimbursement for the COVID-19 related transactions,” Sund said.

In the report on the financial impacts, the city pointed out that it does have an Emergency Reserve of $13.4 million, as well as an additional $4 million in unassigned funds.

“This does not mean the City should utilize this reserve automatically and take no actions,” the city said in its report, which went on to emphasize that “cost mitigation efforts and actions have, and are, being put in place.”

Highlighting some of those mitigation efforts, Sund said the city’s fiscal year budget should be balanced come June 30—when FY 2019-20 ends.

“So, currently, we’re freezing in funding all currently vacant or unfilled positions, we’re reducing and limiting the schedule of part-time/hourly positions, (and) we’re reducing travel and training budget,” he said, adding: “We’re reducing capital improvement commitments … and we’re also reassessing funding provided for non-city entities for potential delay, reduction or cancellation.”

Adding to Sund’s presentation, Rahn said the city usually ends the fiscal year with slightly higher revenue—about 1.5% to 2% above projections—while coming in about 2% to 3% under anticipated spending.

“We’re going to be coming in at a much tighter operating position,” Rahn said of the current fiscal year, which budgeted $71.6 million in general fund expenditures.

San Clemente collected about $2.5 million more in expected revenue for Fiscal Year 2018-19 and spent roughly $2.3 million less than what had been budgeted for that year, San Clemente Times previously reported.

Rhan added that the impacts on sales tax and TOT in the Fiscal Year 2020-2021 budget will ultimately depend on the length of the pandemic and how the state begins to phase out of the stay-at-home orders with businesses reopening.

The council will convene a workshop on Wednesday, May 27, to discuss the city’s proposed FY 2020-21 budget. Sund said the budget will include ongoing shortfall mitigation measures, such as reducing funding for certain capital improvement projects.

The council on Tuesday gave staff a short list of priorities for the proposed fiscal year budget ahead of the workshop That list included not wanting to see any cuts to public safety and not wanting to dip into any of the city’s reserves before first making reductions in discretionary spending, as well as identifying capital improvement projects that can be delayed.

The next regular city council meeting is scheduled for May 19 at 6 p.m.

SR_1Shawn Raymundo
Shawn Raymundo is the city editor for the San Clemente Times. He graduated from Arizona State University with a bachelor’s degree in Global Studies. Before joining Picket Fence Media, he worked as the government accountability reporter for the Pacific Daily News in the U.S. territory of Guam. Follow him on Twitter @ShawnzyTsunami and follow San Clemente Times @SCTimesNews.

Trustworthy, accurate and reliable local news stories are more important now than ever. Support our newsroom by making a contribution and becoming a subscribing member today.

About The Author Staff

comments (1)

  • residents first
    finish the b-trail charge for parking waivers to the casino and miramar our council meetings are supposed to be business meetings don’t give it away we didn’t even get a bus turn out but lost a lot of beach parking to very rich people :::::::::::::::::(-:P

comments (1)

Your email address will not be published.

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>