The article you’re about to read is from our reporters doing their important work — investigating, researching, and writing their stories. We want to provide informative and inspirational stories that connect you to the people, issues and opportunities within our community. Journalism requires lots of resources. Today, our business model has been interrupted by the pandemic; the vast majority of our advertisers’ businesses have been impacted. That’s why the SC Times is now turning to you for financial support. Learn more about our new Insider’s program here. Thank you.

By Eric Heinz

Since the summer, the city of San Clemente has been trying to identify the reasons as to why the bacterial levels at the Pier have exceeded the health standards set by the County of Orange’s Heath Care Agency.

“In June 2016, the City Public Works Department started a water quality investigation at the Pier to have a stronger understanding of the reasons behind the summer beach postings issued by the County (OC Beach Info),” Cynthia Mallett, the city’s environmental programs supervisor, stated in an email. “Water quality issues have been occurring during sunny, dry and warm beach days, which means that the Pier’s bacteria problems are not coming from rainwater washing down the watershed.”

A pigeon flies off the end of the San Clemente Pier in this July 17 photo. The city has been trying to determine if birds, humans or other factors are contributing to the contamination of runoff water at the Pier. Photo: File
A pigeon flies off the end of the San Clemente Pier in this July 17 photo. The city has been trying to determine if birds, humans or other factors are contributing to the contamination of runoff water at the Pier. Photo: File

City officials are trying to determine whether the bacteria is coming from human sources or from domesticated animals or any other source such as from droppings from seagulls.

“We have some data from the county’s microbial bacteria study, and we’re trying to determine the source of the bacteria,” Mallett said in a phone interview, adding the city is looking into “bird barrier” options to prevent or deter seagulls from nesting underneath the Pier.

Larry Brennler, the supervising environmental health specialist for the county’s Water Quality Program, said the samples are checked for certain amounts of coliform and enterococcus, an indicator of possible pollution from various areas.

“They are called indicator bacteria because they are relatively easy to collect and analyze, and may show the presence of harmful viruses, bacteria or protozoa (also known as pathogens),” Brennler said in an email.

The Health Care Agency has been tracking water runoff quality at the Pier since mid-2014, and since then, the San Clemente Pier spot has seen an increase in days that exceed the county’s standard of acceptable bacteria.

Mallett said information from the county and the city’s examinations of the water quality will be presented to the Coastal Advisory Committee at the Feb. 9 meeting. Brennler said the San Clemente Marine Safety Department already prohibits swimming below the Pier for safety issues, but swimmers should avoid ocean water contact in any area where bacteria levels have exceeded state health standards. Mallett also said the city’s Code Enforcement officers patrol the Pier Bowl watershed to look for urban runoff and coordinates with the Public Works Department to try to limit the runoff.

Trustworthy, accurate and reliable local news stories are more important now than ever. Support our newsroom by making a contribution and becoming a subscribing member today.

About The Author Staff

comments (7)

  • one of my favorite walks was down the canyon at tee street where ive seen people throwing their dog doo over the fence into the canyon

  • I would like to know how the hundreds of Dogs pooing on the trail a week impacts our beach’s health. The whole trail reeks of dog feces and after it rains it quantifies. I can’t see how this couldn’t affect the bacterial levels. Even picking up after a dog leaves traces of bacteria, and then there is the urine which all seems harmless until you think of how the numbers compound. Take into consideration a lack of rain or the affects of a hard rain after a lack of rain, each scenario would present a different impact, none of which can be good. Look to the Federal Parks who restrict this kind of use by dogs because it is proven to cause harmful health effects on humans and native animals. I know we all love the pooches but the numbers involved spell a recipe for disaster. Is anyone doing solid testing along the trail. Seems obvious to me that the numbers would show a spike relative to the opening on the trail and it’s use increasing. I think it is high time this is taken seriously.

  • I am curious to see what the root cause of this turns out to be. I fear it could be a buried sewage line that has been compromised.

  • How about we get all the filth, trash, poop and hazardous materials left by transients out of our canyons?

comments (7)

Your email address will not be published.

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>