The article you’re about to read is from our reporters doing their important work — investigating, researching, and writing their stories. We want to provide informative and inspirational stories that connect you to the people, issues and opportunities within our community. Journalism requires lots of resources. Today, our business model has been interrupted by the pandemic; the vast majority of our advertisers’ businesses have been impacted. That’s why the SC Times is now turning to you for financial support. Learn more about our new Insider’s program here. Thank you.

By Eric Heinz

In order to comply with new state statutes, the San Clemente City Council voted to direct staff to work on three different laws that would allow for accessory dwelling units as well as junior dwelling units (extra rooms in homes). The laws will come before the Planning Commission before being reintroduced to City Council at a later meeting.

The city’s laws were a bit more prohibitive in that they did not allow for accessory dwellings if it increased the density of the lots past a certain point.

The bills, AB 2299 and 2406 as well as SB 1069, all affect the housing laws in some way. They were created in order to address serious housing concerns in California, which studies have shown is dwindling in major metropolitan areas as populations continue to increase.

The accessory dwelling units law will also come with a traffic study, which the city will pay $10,000 for, in order to see which areas would be able to accommodate the units and what impacts it could have on parking. The areas of the study are primarily west of Interstate 5, where narrow streets and multifamily units are prevalent.

Click here to read the full documents of the new laws.

Article updated at 1:49 p.m. on Thursday to reflect the City Council’s direction of the laws to the Planning Commission. 

Trustworthy, accurate and reliable local news stories are more important now than ever. Support our newsroom by making a contribution and becoming a subscribing member today.

About The Author Staff

comments (1)

  • our traffic and parking study’s have all been jaded and flat wrong and only seam to benefit the cronies developer the historic society the dba and not our residents ,,sure a traffic study will be negative when you flood neighborhoods with 400+ partiers 7 restaurant with no parking like the miramar theater remember the city lot costs money our streets in-front of our homes dont

    id like to hear from you all whats more inportaint in order ,?? beach parking and access ,, commuter parking ,,, pool house parking or privite business for profit parking on citizen owned lots =

comments (1)

Your email address will not be published.

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>