SUPPORT THIS INDEPENDENT JOURNALISM
The article you’re about to read is from our reporters doing their important work — investigating, researching, and writing their stories. We want to provide informative and inspirational stories that connect you to the people, issues and opportunities within our community. Journalism requires lots of resources. Today, our business model has been interrupted by the pandemic; the vast majority of our advertisers’ businesses have been impacted. That’s why the SC Times is now turning to you for financial support. Learn more about our new Insider’s program here. Thank you.

Laura Ferguson

By Councilmember Laura Ferguson

May 3 was World Press Freedom Day, declared by the U.N. 30 years ago and observed annually with a different theme.  It raises awareness of freedom of the press and reminds government of its duty to uphold the right to freedom of expression.

This year’s theme: Information for the Public Good.

I ran for office seeking transparency to ensure the public has government information. As an elected official, I am entitled to records in the administration of my duties, but information is not consistently provided. 

I’ve tried to create a more transparent government, but through a concerted effort, the majority of city council, city management, and the city attorney have tightened the screws on transparency. If I were to pick a theme for city hall, it would be “Information for the Public Only When We Say So.”

I recently submitted a request for communications between city council, the city attorney and the interim city manager related to a new council policy. The city responded by giving me back my own email communications and one record showing the city attorney emailing a link to the city’s insurance provider. 

The city is withholding documents based on a false claim of confidentiality, which is not a legal basis to withhold documents from a councilmember. 

The city has a history of claiming confidentiality to keep secrets from the public, such as the taxpayer-funded voter opinion poll and threat of a lawsuit from a former city manager that I released publicly.  

Transparency matters. Last November, the city council approved hiring four consultants without ever seeing the contract terms or scope of services.

This year, it hired another consultant (the contract was unseen), amounting to five consultants billing a total of $528,000 annually to fight a toll road despite the TCA unanimously voting not to pursue a road through San Clemente.

The contracts were not published for the public to review and critique. We never see any work product from these consultants. 

When contracts are approved this way, there is no accountability. In 2019, I discovered a contract with Englander, Knabe and Allen was 230% over budget and expired and $465,000 more than the agreed upon amount, yet the city kept paying the $25,000 per month on an expired contract.

Then, not only did a councilmember scold me, the council majority renewed the contract at $32,500 per month. I called out an unrelated contract that exceeded the $100,000 limit by $45,000, and one councilmember demanded we return to closed session for a verbal reprimand. 

I proposed adopting a Sunshine Ordinance (required transparency). The council opted for the status quo. A Sunshine Law allows for greater rights of access than state law. 

If our city is transparent, it will reduce the demand for public records from more than 75 California Public Records Act requests filed last month alone, which would save more money.   

Public records requests are expensive, because the city’s contract law firm—Best, Best & Krieger—is authorized to bill $5,000 a month in public records-requests work, in addition to its retainer for general legal services of $40,000 a month. 

San Clemente is the only client of BB&K’s with this fee arrangement. Almost every other city handles this duty in-house. Yet, the council refuses to take this unnecessary work from BB&K.

I’ll keep working toward more transparency and fiscal responsibility and shine a light on city business—the good news and the bad—and share my opinion freely under the First Amendment.

I look forward to seeing you at the beach and on the Coastal Trail this summer. I welcome you to contact me about city business at fergusonl@san-clemente.org or 949.606.4537. 

Laura Ferguson was elected to the San Clemente City Council in 2018.

BECOME AN INSIDER TODAY
Trustworthy, accurate and reliable local news stories are more important now than ever. Support our newsroom by making a contribution and becoming a subscribing member today.

About The Author Staff

comments (2)

  • You mention:

    “I proposed adopting a Sunshine Ordinance (required transparency). The council opted for the status quo. A Sunshine Law allows for greater rights of access than state law.”

    I went through past agendas and minutes. I could not find anything that you proposed or anything that the rest of the council declined to adopt. What did you propose? What was your ordinance? What did the council decline to adopt? I would really like to know because as far as I can tell, you just complain without any real solutions. Perhaps I just missed the solutions that you proposed.

    From my research, this is what I found:

    At the December 18, 2018 meeting:
    Ms. Ferguson requested that a report be presented regarding San Clemente’s Sunshine Ordinance and those types of laws in general at the January 15, 2019.
    https://www.san-clemente.org/Home/ShowDocument?id=49005

    The requested report was given at the Jan 15, 2019 meeting where it seems to be agreed that San Clemente is doing a good job. You make no mention of the Sunshine Ordinance/Law.
    https://www.san-clemente.org/Home/ShowDocument?id=48789

    Here is the YouTube link to the discussion regarding Sunshine Ordinances/Laws. It seems like Mayor Ward has the most input on it.
    https://youtu.be/31B38RbFRow?list=PL4oL7wx4Y4s5dElAry81t1SMT4rOFs6Pe&t=8044

    I see that you mentioned Sunshine Ordinances/Laws again at the start of 2020: “Looking ahead, I would like to see us refocus on bringing transparency and open government to city hall via a Sunshine Ordinance and reestablishing our city’s ethics policy that was scrapped years ago. “
    https://www.sanclementetimes.com/city-council-corner-maintaining-commitments-as-an-elected-official/
    But I see no indication that you followed up on this. Did you?

    At the March 11, 2019 council meeting, I see meeting minutes that you were looking into public access software. But I could not find anything further on it. Did you do anything?

  • I want to give a BIG thanks to Laura Ferguson for her heroic support of our 2nd Amendment rights in her vote to make San Clemente a Second Amendment Freedom City. The gun grabbing left wish to undermine our Constitutional right to keep and bear arms. They would take away law abiding citizens’ ability to defend themselves thus making San Clemente less safe. Some of these same gun grabbers are also those who call for defunding the police, another foolish measure that is anathema to public safety.

    Thanks also go to Steven Knoblock and especially to Gene James, the architect of this common sense measure. I appreciate that there are still Constitutional patriots in government upholding the principles of our Founding Fathers against those who have no love for either America or our Constitution.

    “…shall NOT be infringed!”

comments (2)

Your email address will not be published.

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>