The article you’re about to read is from our reporters doing their important work — investigating, researching, and writing their stories. We want to provide informative and inspirational stories that connect you to the people, issues and opportunities within our community. Journalism requires lots of resources. Today, our business model has been interrupted by the pandemic; the vast majority of our advertisers’ businesses have been impacted. That’s why the SC Times is now turning to you for financial support. Learn more about our new Insider’s program here. Thank you.

Kathy Ward

By Councilmember Kathy Ward

The Transportation Corridor Agencies (TCA) and California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) are currently conducting a study for toll roads and toll lanes.

The TCA came out in 2016 with a destructive proposal to extend its 241 Toll Road through local neighborhoods in order to connect it to Interstate 5 at Avenida Pico.

The TCA and Caltrans have also proposed to widen the freeway by two lanes on each side for toll lanes, which would destroy homes and businesses along I-5 and El Camino Real, greatly impacting the buildings and homes that are left.

TCA wants to put toll lanes on I-5 through San Clemente so it can build and connect toll lanes into San Diego County. San Diego has plans to build toll lanes between Oceanside and La Jolla, where the traffic is heaviest, but it does not plan to build lanes north of Oceanside to San Clemente.

At issue are the development fees Orange County residents pay that are supposed to be for local benefit only. So, could these development fees be used for improvements in San Diego County?

All of the cities within the TCA agreed to charge residents for two toll roads only, the Foothill and Eastern and the San Joaquin Hills Toll Roads. The fees have been collected for those and should not go to anything else.

Ladera Ranch, San Juan Capistrano, San Clemente and Rancho Mission Viejo all oppose the toll roads through their communities. San Clemente did its own traffic study in order to get the truth about traffic in South County.

The study indicated that toll lanes would provide little benefit, and the same could be accomplished with less damaging arterial road improvements. Our study confirmed TCA’s initial studies that indicated there was a low traffic count on the 241 Toll Road that ends at Oso Parkway.

In 2006, TCA stated its toll road would save drivers 31,000 vehicle hours by 2025. But in 2017, a TCA preliminary study reported it would save only 1,740 vehicle hours and not until the year 2050, which is another 25 years later.

TCA hasn’t been able to build this 241 extension. They were told they would never be able to build a toll road through Trestles and never would receive a coastal permit. Since the death of the road in 2008, TCA has spent millions of dollars trying to come up with something else.

The toll road is bad for San Clemente’s future and our quality of life. No transportation agencies build roads through established cities, because it is well known the damage it will do to the community. The existing toll roads were built in open space and the cities were planned and built around them later.

The time is now to express your concerns. Please go to to do so.

The deadline to have your voice heard is Friday, Feb. 7, at 5 p.m. Toward the bottom, there is a link to write comments. Please make sure your voice is heard.

Kathy Ward is a city councilmember who was elected in 2014 and re-elected in 2018.

EDITOR’S NOTE: San Clemente Times was unable to verify the claim that the TCA estimated its toll road would save 31,000 vehicle hours by 2025.

Trustworthy, accurate and reliable local news stories are more important now than ever. Support our newsroom by making a contribution and becoming a subscribing member today.

About The Author Staff

comments (0)

Your email address will not be published.

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>