The article you’re about to read is from our reporters doing their important work — investigating, researching, and writing their stories. We want to provide informative and inspirational stories that connect you to the people, issues and opportunities within our community. Journalism requires lots of resources. Today, our business model has been interrupted by the pandemic; the vast majority of our advertisers’ businesses have been impacted. That’s why the SC Times is now turning to you for financial support. Learn more about our new Insider’s program here. Thank you.


Notion fails to get majority City Council support

By Eric Heinz

 Following the California Department of Parks and Recreation’s decision to shut off exterior beach showers and some water facilities, Councilman Bob Baker said he would like the city to follow suit at its beaches.

“The seriousness of this drought is not being overstated in any way, shape or form,” Baker said during Tuesday night’s City Council meeting. “It’s getting worse. The citizens and the city have met our 25 percent goal the last couple months.”

Baker also mentioned he has witnessed flagrant uses of water, which could be conserved.

Councilman Tim Brown said it would be a step too far and the city has already made significant strides in water conservation.

“I think we’ve been a model community, and this is a miniscule savings compared to what we’ve all done as a city,” Brown said.

Mayor Chris Hamm said he would be in favor of some kind of compromise, possibly keeping one shower head open and capping the rest for the duration of the drought.

The majority of council members did not support putting the decision to shut off showers at San Clemente beaches on a future meeting agenda. —EH

Editor’s note: This story has been clarified to reflect the actions of the City Council  more accurately. 

Trustworthy, accurate and reliable local news stories are more important now than ever. Support our newsroom by making a contribution and becoming a subscribing member today.

About The Author Staff

comments (3)

  • If 4 people want to use the shower and 3 of the heads are capped off and 1 is on, won’t the other 3 people simply que up to use the single shower?

    This solution merely inconveniences the public and saves no water.

  • Shutting off the showers will have very little, if any, impact on water usage. If the showers at the beaches are capped people will just rinse off at home. This “solution” is not going to stop people from rising off after going to the beach, it will simply shift the cost burden from the city to the individual.

comments (3)

Your email address will not be published.

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>