SUPPORT THIS INDEPENDENT JOURNALISM
The article you’re about to read is from our reporters doing their important work — investigating, researching, and writing their stories. We want to provide informative and inspirational stories that connect you to the people, issues and opportunities within our community. Journalism requires lots of resources. Today, our business model has been interrupted by the pandemic; the vast majority of our advertisers’ businesses have been impacted. That’s why the SC Times is now turning to you for financial support. Learn more about our new Insider’s program here. Thank you.
The proposed public parking lot to be built at 1832 El Camino Real in the city’s north beach was brought up by community members during the oral communications portion of Tuesday’s meeting.
The California Coastal Commission gave the city the option to withdraw the application and submit a new application for an alternative proposal than the original proposal from past meetings.
During a May 13 meeting, the city of San Clemente had given its proposal to the commission, but during the commission meeting May 13 in Santa Barbara the city’s public works department said to consider an alternative to the commission with certain conditions. The parking lot is designated at 1832 El Camino Real in the city’s north beach, and it is to be almost 200 feet parallel and 100 feet perpendicular to the coastline.
In January, the proposal was postponed because opposition to the city’s proposal had been brought by some community members.
Some of the inquiries from the commission included a lack of parking compliant with the Americans with Disabilities Act, secondary exits, ocean views impediment from large trees proposed in the center of the lot and adequate parking spaces.
To alleviate some of the concerns, applicants proposed to reduce the height of the parking lot by 2 feet.
With as much coastal view as possible from the sidewalks and proposed adjacent greenery surrounding it, the commissioners said they would like to see the community members’ alternative in a proposal in the near future.
The people who spoke during oral communications said they would like to see the city include the alternative accepted by the commission for a council meeting in the near future. If the council does not approve the alternative, the speakers said that it would set the project back significantly. The entirety of the commission’s hearing is available at www.cal-span.org for the May 13 meeting under item 16(b) starting at time mark two hours and 30 minutes (2:30:00).