The article you’re about to read is from our reporters doing their important work — investigating, researching, and writing their stories. We want to provide informative and inspirational stories that connect you to the people, issues and opportunities within our community. Journalism requires lots of resources. Today, our business model has been interrupted by the pandemic; the vast majority of our advertisers’ businesses have been impacted. That’s why the SC Times is now turning to you for financial support. Learn more about our new Insider’s program here. Thank you.

Fred Swegles

By Fred Swegles

What if we had a two-lane road, instead of the Beach Trail, running from North Beach around Mariposa Point to the pier?

Fifty years ago, I wrote an article for the Daily Sun-Post announcing the city’s proposal to build a “scenic beach road.”

We published a rather simple photo illustration, showing how a 40-foot-wide road might look, perched on top of a crib wall that the city would build onto the side of the bluff.

“We feel it’s expensive but feasible,” City Engineer Phil Peter told the city council.

The mile-long road would have offered one lane in each direction and parallel parking. The “scenic drive” would have been about halfway up the bluff, commanding a spectacular view maybe 40 feet above the railroad tracks.

The cost was estimated at $2.3 million including excavation, the crib wall, landfill and acquisition of about four acres of bluff property from homeowners.

A major obstacle, officials said, was a big condominium project that was then being planned along Corto Lane. It was to extend partway down the bluff, possibly forcing the scenic road there to “descend within 20 feet of the railroad’s right of way.”

Although the high cost was a concern of the city council, city staff predicted the road could pay for itself over a 10-year period if the city charged a 25-cent toll for using the road and placed 514 parking meters along the way.

In 1963, San Clemente voters approved the purchase of privately owned beaches south of T-Street while rejecting a proposal for a road from Calafia Beach to Linda Lane Beach.


Planning commissioners voiced mixed reactions. Then parks commissioners declared a loud “no.”

Supporters said the road could be a boon to tourism, offering freeway motorists a scenic view of the ocean that couldn’t be seen from I-5.

“A thing like this, in my opinion, would gain a recognition in a sense like Big Sur,” Peter told commissioners. “People would want to drive it.”

Commissioners opined that the scenic drive would lure freeway users off I-5, taking Avenida Pico to Boca de la Playa at North Beach, leading to a coastal experience taking visitors to the pier and introducing them to our Avenida Del Mar business district.

But commissioners also felt that San Clementeans wouldn’t want to have to pay to drive the road or be double-charged by paying parking meters on it to use the beach. And they wondered if the tourist road would lead to traffic congestion on Avenida Del Mar.


The city council, skeptical of the costs and obstacles, abandoned the idea after parks commissioners lambasted it as “stupid,” “silly” and “ridiculous.”

Parks commissioners said it would destroy the beauty of San Clemente’s coastline and could face legal challenges, right-of-way acquisition disagreement and high construction costs.

This wasn’t, however, the first beachfront road that San Clemente had considered.

This cross section from a 1963 study detailed in the newspaper depicts, from left, the railroad tracks, a road on the beach, a concession stand and the sandy beach.


In 1963, the city hired local engineers Bill and Eugene Ayer to study the feasibility to build a coastal road from Calafia Beach to Linda Lane Beach, including beach parking and safe pedestrian RR crossings at intervals.

“All out-of-town automobiles will be subject to an admission fee of $1 per day, which includes parking,” a newspaper account reported. “Homeowners and permanent renters of San Clemente will be allowed a yearly pass costing between $5 and $10 per year. There will be no charge for use of the beach by pedestrians. However, a one-hour parking limit should be imposed on all streets within two blocks of the beachfront.”

The Ayer brothers suggested bond funding to build the road and installation of 672 parking meters along the way.

The road proposal was rejected by San Clemente voters. The concept resurfaced, only briefly, in 1995 while the city was considering building a beach boardwalk between North Beach and Calafia Beach.


Patricia Ayer, whose late husband, Eugene, co-authored the 1963 engineering study, presented the extensive study to the city, suggesting it be revisited.

As I wrote in 1995, Ayer told the city council that the main problem 32 years earlier was that cost of the road “was evidently more than the city’s population of 5,000 wanted to bear.”

A stretch of San Clemente beach—south of T-Street to state-owned beaches—was private back then. The beach would need to have been purchased by the city, then the cost of the road.

Two measures were placed before voters—purchase the private beach for the public and to build the road. The beach purchase was approved overwhelmingly; the road was nixed.

This sketch of a road concept presented to San Clemente’s city council in 1971 is from a clipping of the front page of the Daily Sun-Post to illustrate an article titled “Scenic Bluff Road Unveiled.”


While the road from Calafia to Linda Lane never came to be, parking lots eventually were developed at each end.

The city created a grassy park with a beach parking lot in Linda Lane Canyon. Back then, Calafia Beach also was an undeveloped canyon entrance to a beach. The city, the county and the state parks department entered into a cooperative agreement to establish Calafia Beach Park.

I came across a 1968 Sun-Post article that might raise your eyebrows. It never got anywhere.


“Three levels of parking decks accommodating a total of 660 cars and a park facility at the beach are parts of a new concept proposed for Linda Lane Canyon,” the article said.

Proponents suggested that a parking structure would be much better use of the footprint than surface parking, offering more than three times as much parking than a surface lot. The structure would not disturb homeowners’ ocean views, the proponents suggested, “as the parking levels would not rise higher than 40 feet from the bottom of the canyon.”


City councilmembers referred the Linda Lane idea to the city engineer for a feasibility study and cost estimates. But I didn’t find any follow-up articles, and I don’t recall any idea for a Linda Lane parking structure from the time I began my Sun-Post tenure in 1970.

Fred Swegles grew up in San Clemente before the freeway. He has 50 years’ reporting experience in the city and can be reached at

Trustworthy, accurate and reliable local news stories are more important now than ever. Support our newsroom by making a contribution and becoming a subscribing member today.

About The Author Staff

comments (0)

Your email address will not be published.

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>