SUPPORT THIS INDEPENDENT JOURNALISM
The article you’re about to read is from our reporters doing their important work — investigating, researching, and writing their stories. We want to provide informative and inspirational stories that connect you to the people, issues and opportunities within our community. Journalism requires lots of resources. Today, our business model has been interrupted by the pandemic; the vast majority of our advertisers’ businesses have been impacted. That’s why the SC Times is now turning to you for financial support. Learn more about our new Insider’s program here. Thank you.

By Shawn Raymundo

The city council last week unanimously approved an amendment to San Clemente’s General Plan, recognizing the anticipated continuation of Los Patrones Parkway—the untolled thoroughfare set to extend south, ending just inside the northern city limits.

The General Plan amendment, approved by the council at its Feb. 16 meeting, incorporates the extension of Los Patrones, ensuring that the city’s road map is consistent with the county’s Master Plan of Arterial Highways (MPAH)—a requirement to qualify for roadway project grant funding under Measure M2.

“At this point, what we are doing is we are asking to put essentially a line on a map on the Master Plan of Arterial Highways that we could build LPPE (Los Patrones Parkway Extension) in order to qualify for funding and other opportunities,” Nicole Walsh, senior assistant county counsel, told councilmembers.

Los Patrones, which begins where the 241 Toll Road ends and currently runs through Rancho Mission Viejo (commonly referred to as The Ranch), is planned to eventually connect to Avenida La Pata, stretching roughly 700 feet past the San Clemente city limits.

While still in the concept phase, the project to extend the parkway as a free arterial route is currently estimated to cost about $240 million, according to Nardy Khan, deputy director for infrastructure programs with OC Public Works.

“We don’t have a firm estimate at this point, as we don’t have the project plans developed. All we have at this point is a concept,” Khan said. “Our early figures of a cost estimate place this at about $240 million.”

Khan further explained that the county’s current request for M2 funds would help foot the cost to complete the project’s environmental document. Additional funding, she said, would also come from The Ranch.

“That’s the beginning of the process, and the funding that we’ve requested is sufficient enough to get us to the point where we will know what the alignment will be, we will know what the environmental impacts will be, we will have a good amount of information at the end of that document,” she said.

According to Khan, the council’s approval of the amendment was the last piece of the puzzle needed to qualify for the M2 grant, as the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) requires the county’s and city’s general plans to be consistent.

Mike Balsamo, senior vice president of governmental relations for The Ranch, told the council that should OCTA approve the grant funding for the project, “the county and The Ranch can continue on with the design process and keep the road moving along its current trajectory.”

The amendment comes after the city, the county and The Ranch signed on to a cooperative agreement this past December, acknowledging that the design plans for Los Patrones will not include considerations to develop the controversial extension of the 241.

Currently, Los Patrones runs between Oso Parkway in the north to Cow Camp Road in RMV. Once the extension is completed, a roughly 700-foot stretch of Los Patrones will be inside San Clemente’s city limits, just past La Pata.

Addressing concerns regarding the feasibility of the Transportation Corridor Agencies, at some point in the future, deciding to condemn the facility and convert it into a toll road, the county and Ranch officials provided reassurances that such an endeavor would be difficult to accomplish.

Walsh noted that while it’s conceivable, it would mean two public agencies—the TCA and the county—would be pitted against one another in eminent domain proceedings, leaving it to the court “to decide whose public interest outweighs whose.”

Balsamo noted that turning an arterial highway into a freeway isn’t a simple conversion, calling it “extremely difficult,” as it would require additional space. He also pointed to the area’s hilly terrain, slope embankments and The Ranch’s own development plans to put in businesses near the planned parkway extension.

“We would begin, in time, to develop on the areas around the road, trying to put the most compatible uses as we can near the road—maybe it’s more employment-based and keep the housing a little bit more buffered—but, certainly, we would like to keep the footprint as efficient as possible to preserve the development rights that we have in the area,” he said.

According to Walsh, a decision on the M2 grant funds is expected to be made in late March or early April.

SR_1Shawn Raymundo
Shawn Raymundo is the city editor for the San Clemente Times. He graduated from Arizona State University with a bachelor’s degree in Global Studies. Before joining Picket Fence Media, he worked as the government accountability reporter for the Pacific Daily News in the U.S. territory of Guam. Follow him on Twitter @ShawnzyTsunami and follow San Clemente Times @SCTimesNews.

BECOME AN INSIDER TODAY
Trustworthy, accurate and reliable local news stories are more important now than ever. Support our newsroom by making a contribution and becoming a subscribing member today.

About The Author Staff

comments (2)

  • I need to address the paragraph where it mentions “the feasibility of the Transportation Corridor Agencies, at some point in the future, deciding to condemn the facility and covert it into a toll road…”

    On December 9, 2020, the Orange County Planning Commission discussed and voted for the advancement of the Los Patrones Parkway. In response to a public comment, the OC Planning Commission discussed the Transportation Corridor Agencies, TCA’s, involvement in the Los Patrones Parkway Extension. They stated the TCA could condemn the Counties interests of Los Patrones Parkway Extension and take it over in a very public process and toll it. This is quite different from what is conveyed in this article, that the TCA could decide to “condemn the facility.” It would not be a facility nor the actual condemning of the road, but the ownership interests of the county.

    I strongly suggest that people need to listen to the Orange County Planning Commission meeting of December 9, 2020 when they approved the advancement of the Los Patrones Parkway Extension (LPPE). There is a discrepancy with information that was provided at the San Clemente City Council meeting on February 16, 2021 versus what was said at the Planning Commission on December 9th, 2020.

    https://ocds.ocpublicworks.com/sites/ocpwocds/files/2020-12/PC%20Audio%2012-9-20_0.mp3?fbclid=IwAR0sVQ_WRt2XswXXTEcqTpn1e5p8f8OdNH4IASEsgP1CyUeBOTUOCSfuDgI

    Additionally, at that same OC Planning Commission meeting, funding of the Los Patrones Parkway was discussed that the funds would be from OCTA Measure M2 funds and other entities. It is pretty obvious that Measure M2 funds will not be sufficient to solely fund this entire project.

    According to a recent press release by the TCA, on their webpage, “CEO Samuel Johnson noted that, ‘TCA’s focus on sound fiscal practices and innovation were on full display with this refunding. Our team evaluated market conditions and developed a strategy that appealed to both current and new investors, resulting in significant savings and strengthening the Agency’s ability to further reduce debt and consider support of regional projects like the Ortega Highway widening and the County’s Los Patrones Extension.” As of February 16, 2021, the TCA had not been formally asked to fund this project, but it is expected.

    Why would the TCA fund the Los Patrones Parkway Extension, if it was going to remain a free road? They are certainly not doing this out of the goodness of their heart, but to recoup the millions that they have spent for a toll road, the LPPE, or any other routes. This provides the TCA a motive and justification for them to be involved in this project.

  • I need to address the paragraph where it mentions “the feasibility of the Transportation Corridor Agencies, at some point in the future, deciding to condemn the facility and convert it into a toll road…”

    On December 9, 2020, the Orange County Planning Commission discussed and voted for the advancement of the Los Patrones Parkway. In response to a public comment, the OC Planning Commission discussed the Transportation Corridor Agencies, TCA, involvement in the Los Patrones Parkway Extension. They stated the TCA could condemn the Counties interests of Los Patrones Parkway Extension and take it over in a very public process and toll it. This is quite different from what is conveyed in this article, that the TCA could decide to “condemn the facility.” It would not be a facility nor the actual condemning of the road, but the ownership interests of the county.

    I strongly suggest that people need to listen to the Orange County Planning Commission meeting of December 9, 2020 when they approved the advancement of the Los Patrones Parkway Extension (LPPE). There is a discrepancy with information that was provided at the San Clemente City Council on February 16, 2021 versus what was said at the Planning Commission on December 9th, 2020.

    https://ocds.ocpublicworks.com/sites/ocpwocds/files/2020-12/PC%20Audio%2012-9-20_0.mp3?fbclid=IwAR0sVQ_WRt2XswXXTEcqTpn1e5p8f8OdNH4IASEsgP1CyUeBOTUOCSfuDgI

    Additionally, at that same OC Planning Commission meeting, funding of the Los Patrones Parkway was discussed that the funds would be from OCTA Measure M2 funds and other entities. It is pretty obvious that Measure M2 funds will not be sufficient to solely fund this entire project.

    According to a recent press release by the TCA, on their webpage, “CEO Samuel Johnson noted that, ‘TCA’s focus on sound fiscal practices and innovation were on full display with this refunding. Our team evaluated market conditions and developed a strategy that appealed to both current and new investors, resulting in significant savings and strengthening the Agency’s ability to further reduce debt and consider support of regional projects like the Ortega Highway widening and the County’s Los Patrones Extension.” As of February 16, 2021, the TCA had not been formally asked to fund this project, but it is expected.

    Why would the TCA fund the Los Patrones Parkway Extension, if it was going to remain a free road? They are certainly not doing this out of the goodness of their heart, but to recoup the millions that they have spent for a toll road, the LPPE, or any other routes. This provides the TCA a motive and justification for them to be involved in this project.

comments (2)

Your email address will not be published.

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>