The article you’re about to read is from our reporters doing their important work — investigating, researching, and writing their stories. We want to provide informative and inspirational stories that connect you to the people, issues and opportunities within our community. Journalism requires lots of resources. Today, our business model has been interrupted by the pandemic; the vast majority of our advertisers’ businesses have been impacted. That’s why the SC Times is now turning to you for financial support. Learn more about our new Insider’s program here. Thank you.

SCSQUARED halfBy Eric Heinz 

The resident-based organization San Clemente Vacation Rentals Alliance (SCVRA) filed a lawsuit June 20 against the city, claiming its short-term lodging unit laws are out of compliance with the California Coastal Act.

The California Coastal Commission gives cities the option to adopt their own coastal land use plan (CLUP) in order for more self-governance. Until they do so, cities must apply for coastal development permits for construction that must comply with the Coastal Act, and, as SCVRA argues, the laws that govern the uses within the law’s jurisdiction.

Local resident James Payne, who represents San Clemente Vacation Rental Alliance, stated in a letter to the California Coastal Commission that the permitting process has reduced the 512 permittees down to about 68. This would have an impact of eliminating 87 percent of available lodging units and about 25,000 lodging nights for the city, which now requires rental owners to file transient occupancy tax forms to be in compliance.

His statistics were based on a report from the city of San Clemente.

The city’s ordinance requires no short-term lodging unit can operate within 300 feet of another.

Payne and his wife own a STLU in San Clemente, which he said they’ve rented to visitors for more than 14 years.

“SCVRA fully agrees with common sense rules regulating vacation rentals, including quiet hours, occupancy and other restrictions we already have in our rental contracts with vacationers,” Payne stated in an email. “We focus on being good neighbors. The small handful of bad actors can be dealt with via regulatory enforcement actions, which the city of San Clemente put in place shortly before its decision to enact the zoning ban.”

In the lawsuit, SCVRA is asking the court to vacate the ordinances because they believe they did not go through the proper channels outlined in the Coastal Act.

More information on the ordinances can be found within the city’s municipal code at

Trustworthy, accurate and reliable local news stories are more important now than ever. Support our newsroom by making a contribution and becoming a subscribing member today.

About The Author Staff

comments (3)

  • wow….mr. payne……you are just another money-hungry whore looking to make a quick dollar off of a useless ordinance matter. why don’t you…put your big-boy pants on….go get a real ..hard-working, male-=dominant job….vacation-rental….you sound like a cry-baby….go away….keep your grubby sticky fingers out of my home of 40 years….san clemente…..go away….whore….and let our bad-ass mayor run this town just as HE sees fit…not to cater to squeaky wheels like you and your dumb…”scvra” bullsh*t….wahhhhhhhhhhh

  • REALLY SC TIMES!?!! and my comments get deleted/censored?

  • Times have changed and people are not as responsible or respectful of neighbors as they were before.

    San Clemente is a residential community and because of some less responsible VRBO owners the latest ordinances (see link below) are required.

    VRBOs are causing issues countrywide. San Francisco has been in the news for this and most recently Anaheim. Anaheim banned them entirely –

    Thankfully, San Clemente designated areas for VRBOs going forward and gives a two-year window for existing ones outside those areas to transition.

comments (3)

Your email address will not be published.

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>