The article you’re about to read is from our reporters doing their important work — investigating, researching, and writing their stories. We want to provide informative and inspirational stories that connect you to the people, issues and opportunities within our community. Journalism requires lots of resources. Today, our business model has been interrupted by the pandemic; the vast majority of our advertisers’ businesses have been impacted. That’s why the SC Times is now turning to you for financial support. Learn more about our new Insider’s program here. Thank you.

Laura Ferguson, San Clemente

San Clemente voters will soon vote on a citizens-initiated ballot measure that seeks to change the way we vote for City Councilmembers from at-large to by-district elections. Councilmembers elected by-district still take an oath to serve all residents, yet they are more attuned to the unique problems of their constituents. District-based elections also allow the work to be more evenly divided among Councilmembers and has been shown to improve citizen participation because they represent a specific district in a city and are typically more responsive to their constituency.

At great time and expense, a group of diverse citizens obtained sufficient voter signatures in 2016 to place this on the ballot. Our city got very involved in the process and delayed placement of the measure to 2018. The City Council ordered a taxpayer-funded “study” that cost us $18,500, then later spent $16,286 in taxpayer funds to fix inaccurate language in the counter-arguments against the measure in support of by-district elections. Then, after months of requesting public records on related legal bills, the city attorney provided a list of redacted billing totaling $81,000 with no explanation.

There have been occasions when our city has compared by-district elections to Capistrano Unified School District (CUSD), which switched to district-based elections after passage of Measure H in 2010. Not a fair comparison when CUSD’s voting districts cover seven cities and six unincorporated areas. Our districts will only cover San Clemente. Also, during the Talega Mello-Roos advocacy, our very own “by-district” trustee in San Clemente did not help us, but trustees from San Juan Capistrano and Mission Viejo did help us tremendously.

All neighborhoods deserve a voice on City Council. It shouldn’t be them against us. It should be all of us, equally and properly represented. The current system is not working for San Clemente. Council has no solution for the homeless, drug sales and use, rehab homes, improving timely issuance of permits, increasing police presence, an abandoned City Hall, and runaway legal costs.

For information, please join us at our new Facebook page at District Elections Now.

Trustworthy, accurate and reliable local news stories are more important now than ever. Support our newsroom by making a contribution and becoming a subscribing member today.

About The Author Staff

comments (1)

  • Elections by Area has not served taxpayers and students in CUSD because it has made it less expensive for the the teachers union to buy CUSD BOT seats- $60,000 a seat in the last election. Money well spent for all public employees at CUSD who have received 5 consecutive years of across the board compensation increases totaling over $150 million dollars.

    That being said- I do feel it is better for the City of San Clemente to have representation from all areas of the City. It is time for a change. The City faces many issues – the storage of nuclear waste on our beaches, a toll road through the middle of town and rampant homeless issues that threaten the health and safety of our community.

    Citizens need much stronger leaders if we are going to make progress on any of these issues.

    We could also use a new City attorney-

    “Then, after months of requesting public records on related legal bills, the city attorney provided a list of redacted billing totaling $81,000 with no explanation”

    Does anyone remember the scandal at the City of Bell? Well we have the same firm- Best Best and Krieger who also represents two other Cities and CUSD- Conflict of Interest?

    Yep time for a change- well said Laura Ferguson.

comments (1)

Your email address will not be published.

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>