SC_144Cord Bauer, San Clemente

An unresponsive City Council is why I think we’re seeing a push for district elections in San Clemente. Increased crime, transients, drugs or even see-through beach bathrooms seem to get a tone-deaf response from the Council. Thousands of residents have joined online crime forums, have written letters and signed petitions, and yet the net result from our council is the addition of a “half deputy.”
For you conspiracy theorists, the Council meeting to bring up these concerns just prior to voting on the budget this year was canceled.

Now, the district question is coming to the residents of San Clemente, but somehow the City Council has found a way to delay the legal ballot measure. And even though their excuse is that they want to study the issue, they could do that from now until November while still allowing the vote to happen. But they want to delay a public vote by up to two years. How does that make our Council look? How about smell? Do their actions pass the smell test?

District elections and mixed elections (mainly district with an at-large mayoral election) are used in the majority of medium and large municipal governments in the United States, and that number is growing. You heard that right. The Council is delaying a ballot measure by two years to study a type of municipal government that takes place now all over the U.S.

District elections have smaller voting areas, reduce the cost to get elected and help ensure every area and minority of a city is represented on the Council. Most importantly, it helps take special interest money out of elections. Voting by district happens in Santa Barbara, Santa Ana, San Jose and even San Juan Capistrano, population 36,282. Newport Beach has been voting by district since 1906.

Mayor Bob Baker said this ballot measure is “dumb,” and that he wants to “squash this.” Other Council members are more reflective but still negative. And that’s fine, but it should be up to the voters now, not the Council. Don’t stop the democratic process.

If the ballot measure is successful, the City Clerk must empanel the District Elections Task Force within 30 days. The Task Force will look at all the issues and make sure districting works for San Clemente.

City Council, the district ballot measure is not about how we vote; it’s about responsive government. Right now, we don’t have one.

A link to the information provided above can be found at www.nlc.org/build-skills-and-networks/resources/cities-101/city-officials/municipal-elections.

About The Author Staff

comments (3)

  • I could not disagree more strongly with Cord’s assessment and justification to change San Clemente’s method of voting from At Large to District. I went as far as to open the link Mr. Bauer provided and read the potential benefits of each. Much to my surprise, the advantages of our current at large system includes “Better qualified Candidates” and “Council Members in an at large system tend to be more impartial”. There are no applicable benefits listed from a district voting system that applies to San Clemente. Astonishing!

    Mr. Bauer’s writing begins with a few general, scattered thoughts on crime (none specifically pertaining to San Clemente) and concludes with a ridiculously bad idea to change our superior system of elections to an inferior system that takes away your choices and your voice. Today every citizen has the right to vote for each of 5 Council seats. Mr. Bauer thinks it better to restrict your voice by taking away your voice by limiting your vote to one candidate.

    Mr. Bauer, today I can vote for 5 Council members, if your scheme comes to fruition, I have only one vote. Remind me again why less choice is better?

  • Larry Corwin, you nailed it! Why would less choice EVER be better!!!

  • Thanks Sarah, it does seem pretty clear when people learn the real facts. Speaking of facts, the organization who commissioned the signature gathering for the most part, hired young college aged men to explain why they were collecting signatures. I spent about an hour and a half at one of their locations and observed their tactics.

    When someone was ready to sign based on what very misleading statements made by the paid per signature signature gathers, I took 20 seconds to explain the real facts behind the methods of voting. In the time I spent, 14 out of 16 people who were going to sign, did not. 2 people actually wanted to sign. This suggests to me that when this issue ever makes a ballot measure If it ever does), it will be resoundingly rejected.

comments (3)

Your email address will not be published.

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>