The article you’re about to read is from our reporters doing their important work — investigating, researching, and writing their stories. We want to provide informative and inspirational stories that connect you to the people, issues and opportunities within our community. Journalism requires lots of resources. Today, our business model has been interrupted by the pandemic; the vast majority of our advertisers’ businesses have been impacted. That’s why the SC Times is now turning to you for financial support. Learn more about our new Insider’s program here. Thank you.

SCSQUARED half By Larry Culbertson, San Clemente

San Clemente is the Spanish Village by the Sea. One feature that our founder, Ole Hanson, did to create his dream village was to install red tile sidewalks. Over 6 and a half miles were installed between 1926 to 1928. While that is a small fraction of the more than 146 miles of plain concrete sidewalks in the city, they are an integral part of our cultural heritage as Ole’s Spanish Village. Unfortunately, there is a movement afoot to phase out this part of our history.

Decades ago, our city leaders considered our red tile sidewalks important enough to map and measure where every foot of those sidewalks existed. Their intent, according to our city engineer was to eventually fill in every gap on streets that had tile, with continuous red tile sidewalk. In 2006, the city commissioned a study ($34,000) to update our Historic Structures List (HSL). The consultant, Historic Resources Group, made a number of recommendations, one of which was to include our historic tile sidewalks on the HSL. They rated the tile sidewalks as follows: “Appears eligible for National Register as a contributor to a National Register eligible district.” Based on that recommendation, on Oct. 2, 2007 our council voted 4-0 to add our tile sidewalks to our HSL. They have been safe and protected for these past eight years.

Tile sidewalks, like plain concrete sidewalks, do not last forever. Since these tile sidewalks are over 85 years old, they are deteriorating. Our city has a policy of splitting the cost of replacement of any public sidewalk with the property owner abutting the sidewalk. Tile sidewalk costs about three times what a concrete one does. My understanding is $30 per square foot versus $10 per square foot.

The thought process driving the idea to stop protecting our tile sidewalks is twofold. One, it is not fair to force one property owner to spend more on sidewalks in front of their house just because it is tile. Two, it is not fair to taxpayers, who share the cost, to spend more on tile sidewalks than they would for concrete.

These are specious arguments. When people buy a historic property, including one on a street with historic sidewalks, they are accepting certain obligations that buyers of non-historic properties do not have. One should not buy a 1926 Ole Hanson house with the idea that they will be allowed to bulldoze it. They won’t.

With respect to the unfairness of spending taxpayer money for something that not everyone uses—again specious—I speak to many people who never use any of our 21 parks, or our beaches, or pier, or golf course, or beach trail, or Ole Hanson Beach Club, or Casa Romantica. Should we defund them? Of course not! Cities have an obligation to provide services and to protect the integrity of the community.

Part of the historic integrity of San Clemente lies in our historic sidewalks. On Oct. 20, please tell our City Council to leave our tile sidewalks on Our Historic Structure List where they belong. Leave the current tile sidewalk policy in place. It was established long ago, was well thought out and needs no modification.

Trustworthy, accurate and reliable local news stories are more important now than ever. Support our newsroom by making a contribution and becoming a subscribing member today.

About The Author Staff

comments (5)

  • Couldn’t agree more. The short-term savings from replacing these beautiful and historic features will soon be forgotten. But they will be missed forever, and a part of San Clemente’s unique attractiveness will go with them.

  • bull TO ask a tax payer to cover a shared expense of $30 a SQ foot when that same expense’s $10 a SQ foot would cover the whole coast plus 50% more walk way is just decadent and if I may B especially when so many do without walk ways or the sharing of expenses .

    Now let the private sector or home owner do the job without California unfair labor laws and we can save another 60% on the cost of sidewalks or freeways or beach trails , ect
    the historical society in our city have become unreasonable , unaffordable purveyors of blight and anti health and safety led by profiteers’ and tong waggers with their hands firmly on their hips
    I ask the council to vote no and take care of the rest of our community first I’d also like to point out that marble sidewalks would cost about the same “MARBLE”

  • I agree with the author and the first comment in favor of preserving these minor historic features. They have been discussed, as part of the heritage of SC as we take guests to the pier and Max Berg Park. The SC red concrete sidewalks are also noted. There are people that enjoy the architectural history as well as the fine climate and amenities. Keep the roof and sidewalk tiles. Look at the new ones along Ralph’s there is new construction that blends historically. Community pride may take many forms, this being a minor contribution to the quality of life.

  • Jim who ?

    i’am sure you and your friends get a good laugh out of the decadents and abuse of tax payers moneys at the cost of health and safety elsewhere in our community

  • Having been a business owner on Del Mar for years, I always thought these bricks were ugly. The local”designer/artist” chose those bricks to her style, and even at that time, several years ago, they were already outdated. There are much better choices. I would consider the current bricks the “unclassy” choice. Maybe that’s appropriate for the area. But I think they look old, dirty, and cheap.

comments (5)

Your email address will not be published.

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>