SUPPORT THIS INDEPENDENT JOURNALISM
The article you’re about to read is from our reporters doing their important work — investigating, researching, and writing their stories. We want to provide informative and inspirational stories that connect you to the people, issues and opportunities within our community. Journalism requires lots of resources. Today, our business model has been interrupted by the pandemic; the vast majority of our advertisers’ businesses have been impacted. That’s why the SC Times is now turning to you for financial support. Learn more about our new Insider’s program here. Thank you.
CAROLE DOUGHERTY, San Clemente
I am opposed to San Clemente being declared a Second Amendment Sanctuary City.
I see this resolution as governmental redundancy and overreach. We in San Clemente are already bound by the Second Amendment and have the right to bear arms. We don’t need local government to restate this constitutional right.
What’s the point of passing this resolution if San Clemente doesn’t broadcast this status? To publicize this status could be costly.
Will it require signage at all the city’s boundaries—freeway and local streets? It will probably require amending city stationary to add a divisive phrase to our welcoming motto: Spanish Village by the Sea.
Most importantly, the resolution, when promoted, may be off-putting to tourism. To me, it presents an image of San Clemente as a city of gun-toting residents—not a welcoming place for individuals and families to visit or vacation in.
I am strongly opposed to passing this resolution.