SUPPORT THIS INDEPENDENT JOURNALISM
The article you’re about to read is from our reporters doing their important work — investigating, researching, and writing their stories. We want to provide informative and inspirational stories that connect you to the people, issues and opportunities within our community. Journalism requires lots of resources. Today, our business model has been interrupted by the pandemic; the vast majority of our advertisers’ businesses have been impacted. That’s why the SC Times is now turning to you for financial support. Learn more about our new Insider’s program here. Thank you.
JIM SMITH, San Clemente
I must have been near the target, since three people responded to my letter about mask wearing.
Here’s a comment on each. Vicki Marks finds it a mystery that I questioned the science of the mask edict despite the CDC. She missed the fact that the CDC had previously said masks are only needed if you have the disease or care for someone with it.
Karen Reisdorft didn’t like my expert’s quote, so she changed the topic to people becoming lax about social distancing.
Finally, Tony Hays thinks “disagreement is good,” but gratuitously says there is “universal agreement” favoring masks.
My point is that there’s little evidence how much protection masks offer versus physical distancing of 6 feet or more, or hand washing.
Stay smart and safe.