The article you’re about to read is from our reporters doing their important work — investigating, researching, and writing their stories. We want to provide informative and inspirational stories that connect you to the people, issues and opportunities within our community. Journalism requires lots of resources. Today, our business model has been interrupted by the pandemic; the vast majority of our advertisers’ businesses have been impacted. That’s why the SC Times is now turning to you for financial support. Learn more about our new Insider’s program here. Thank you.

By Eric Heinz 

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) on Wednesday, Jan. 2 announced that it will host another webinar regarding the canisters that store spent nuclear fuel at San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), this time related to the design of those canisters.

One of the casks from Holtec International Inc., the manufacturer of the latest canisters to be loaded at SONGS, was deemed to have an inadequacy, explained by Southern California Edison in June that one of the pins of the ventilation system in the bottom of one of the canisters broke off.

“The apparent violations stem from an incident last March, when workers at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station discovered a loose four-inch stainless steel pin at the bottom of a canister as it was being prepared to be loaded with spent fuel,” a press release from the NRC stated. “The pin was part of a shim designed to support the fuel basket and allow airflow to the fuel assemblies within the canister. As such, the shim is considered essential to the function of the fuel basket.”

At the time, the canister registered higher-than-average radiation levels, but its maximum allowable temperature was not exceeded.

The press release issued on Wednesday did not go into detail about the webinar, but it did say two NRC violations were identified in the incident.

“The NRC determined Holtec, when it changed the shim to the pin design in 2016, failed to establish adequate design control measures for selecting and applying materials, parts, equipment and processes essential to the function of safety-related structures, systems and components,” the press release stated. “Holtec also failed to maintain written records of changes to its canister design, including an evaluation of why the design change could be implemented without applying to the NRC for an amendment to the canister’s Certificate of Compliance.”

Tom Palmisano, vice president of decommissioning and chief nuclear officer of Southern California Edison, explains the "shims" of a Holtec spent nuclear fuel canister during the June 27 Community Engagement Panel meeting in San Clemente. Photo: File
Tom Palmisano, vice president of decommissioning and chief nuclear officer of Southern California Edison, explains the “shims” of a Holtec spent nuclear fuel canister during the June 27 Community Engagement Panel meeting in San Clemente. Photo: File

As part of the NRC enforcement procedures, Holtec was given the option to host a pre-enforcement conference or a third-party mitigation meeting. Holtec chose the conference, the release stated. The NRC will now determine what level of violation was committed and what corrective actions will need to be taken.

SONGS operators are currently on hold with transferring the spent nuclear fuel rods from wet storage to dry-cask storage following the NRC’s decision to investigate an incident on Aug. 3 in which a canister was stuck on an outer ring while it was being loaded into the concrete fortification. A webinar was hosted in November that addressed the operational and training violations it found at SONGS. Southern California Edison stated at the CEP meeting in November that it plans to resume transferring the spent fuel rods by the end of January.

Southern California Edison released a statement on Wednesday afternoon regarding the canister webinar.

“Southern California Edison is aware of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission inspection report and predecisional enforcement conference involving vendor Holtec International with regard to the design of spent fuel storage casks. SCE remains confident, following thorough analysis validated by an independent third-party engineering firm, and ongoing monitoring of the four loaded canisters utilizing the Holtec shim pin design, each canister continues to perform all safety functions. Recall, SCE’s pre-loading inspection verified that shims in each of these four canisters were in the as-designed position,” the statement read. “All other SCE Holtec MPC-37 canisters utilize a non-shim pin design.”

There are 51 canisters on site that are in horizontal dry-cask storage in units built by AREVA; Holtec has 29 canisters already loaded at SONGS with an additional 44 expected to be loaded later this year.

The conference will take place at the NRC Headquarters in Rockville, Maryland, from 1-5 p.m. Eastern (10 a.m.-2 p.m. Pacific) on Wednesday, Jan. 9. The webcast can be found by clicking the link here on the day of. If you can’t watch the meeting live, it will likely be archived at the same website.

Article updated at 2:10 p.m. to clarify the NRC webinar intent and to add the statement on the matter from Southern California Edison. 

Trustworthy, accurate and reliable local news stories are more important now than ever. Support our newsroom by making a contribution and becoming a subscribing member today.

About The Author Staff

comments (2)

  • Both the NRC and Edison admit all 29 of the Holtec canisters loaded have canister walls gouged from the defective loading system, yet Edison wants to load 44 more canisters knowing these million dollar canisters will also be gouged. No wonder they have the worst safety complaint record in the nation of all operating reactors. This is insane. Why is the NRC not shutting this entire operation down? The basket shims are only one of many problems with this Holtec system.

    Gouged canisters are not transportable and can prematurely fail.

    Edison’s “independent experts” claiming defective basket shims are safe is the same MPR Associates that recommended transporting leaking canisters to a non-existent “hot cell” facility in Idaho.

    This Holtec system is a lemon and must be replaced.

  • More lies from anti-nuke leader, Donna Gilmore.

    “Gouged canisters are not transportable and can prematurely fail.”

    There are no “gouged canisters” and even if there were, they are still transportable, unlike the casks you want SONGS to use which do not have a license to store or ship AND are too heavy for SONGS to use. I challenged Donna before to post the source of this hyperbolic claim along with the actual quote and of course, she failed to do so,

    “Why is the NRC not shutting this entire operation down?”

    Simple, because your claims are bogus.

    “…is the same MPR Associates that recommended transporting leaking canisters to a non-existent “hot cell” facility in Idaho.”

    Another lie; MPR did NOT recommend transporting canisters to a non-existent “hot cell”. “Test Area North” at the Idaho National Laboratories (INL) is the facility that has been torn down.
    While the MPR report (Revision 1) correctly referenced a 2013 DOE report, which identified alternative facilities at (INL) that can be used to open and repackage a canister, the MPR report inadvertently called it “Test Area North.”
    Clearly, MPR did not mean to refer to the demolished facility. Otherwise, there would have been no need to point at the 2013 DOE report. The whole point of the 2013 DOE report was to identify an alternative location because “Test Area North” was demolished. Donna either failed to understand this or she is mischaracterizing the paper and MPR. Considering her history of lying, I’m going with the latter.

    The Holtec (and Areva) canister based system is state of the art, used by the entire US nuclear industry as well as in a number of other countries, it will NOT be replaced and Donna knows it. Her website is just as untrustworthy as she is and is indeed simply propaganda.

comments (2)

Your email address will not be published.

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>