The article you’re about to read is from our reporters doing their important work — investigating, researching, and writing their stories. We want to provide informative and inspirational stories that connect you to the people, issues and opportunities within our community. Journalism requires lots of resources. Today, our business model has been interrupted by the pandemic; the vast majority of our advertisers’ businesses have been impacted. That’s why the SC Times is now turning to you for financial support. Learn more about our new Insider’s program here. Thank you.

By C. Jayden Smith

The San Clemente City Council unanimously voted Tuesday night, Jan. 18, to introduce an ordinance prohibiting electric bicycles on the beach, Beach Trail and the municipal pier, as well as amend other activities in the area.

The vote followed the initial approval to consider e-bike bans in areas around the city, namely the coastal trail, during the council’s last meeting on Dec. 21, 2021, when city staff was directed to return with a draft of the ordinance.

Since then, San Clemente residents and e-bike riders vocalized that not all locations needed to ban the vehicles. Following public input during Tuesday’s meeting, language in the draft ordinance prohibiting e-bikes from the city’s municipal, or inland, trails was removed.

Samantha Wylie, director of the Beaches, Parks, and Recreation Department, explained that the ordinance in front of the council was divided into two sections. The first dealt with the prohibition of e-bikes on the municipal trails, and the second was concerned with the beach component.

Councilmember Laura Ferguson said she heard from neighbors and other residents about their displeasure with the inclusion of the inland trails’ prohibition of e-bikes, along with the coastal trail’s, as it was issues related to the Beach Trail that led to the ban.

“To my knowledge, there’s no problem on the trails that are inland,” Ferguson said.

She requested the modification to the ordinance that would remove the section to prohibit e-bikes on the inland trails.

Ward contested that the city does not permit motorized vehicles on any trails, and that the blurred line between e-bikes and motorcycles allows riders to keep operating them despite the fact that all e-bikes have an electric motor. Contrary to another point of Ferguson’s, Ward added that not all the municipal trails are as wide as initially described.

Ward suggested the council ban e-bikes for the time being, until it can address whether they should be counted as motorized vehicles, in which case they would not be allowed on trails.

“Maybe once we do that, we can figure out some inland trails (where) we can work that out and maybe look at the ones that are wide and try to figure out how to do that,” Ward said, adding, “I think, while we’re trying to implement something like this, we need to be consistent.”

However, both Councilmember Steve Knoblock and Mayor Pro Tem Chris Duncan sided with Ferguson’s point of view.

Agreeing with Ferguson that the council lumped in the inland trails with the Beach Trail at the last meeting, Knoblock said he had no problem with removing an inland-trail ban from the ordinance. Duncan added that residents get access to trails they would not otherwise experience without e-bikes.

During her presentation, Wylie also touched on a page within the agenda that contained language regarding the prohibited use of all bicycles on a section of the Beach Trail.

“There’s been an ask from a public safety standpoint, to prohibit the Corto Lane area from bicycle-riding,” she said. “This is the pathway from the asphalt base at the pier to the Corto Lane restroom.”

Staff added a full bike-riding ban within the Corto Lane stretch to the ordinance, and sought further direction from the council.

“Regarding the Corto Lane ‘no bicycles’ (portion), clearly that is a narrow stretch of trail,” Knoblock said. “It’s extremely difficult to walk it, let alone (have) any bikes.”

All councilmembers favored restricting all bicycles in the Corto Lane stretch of the Beach Trail.

Mayor Gene James added that the city will also need to look at e-bike and bicycle behavior on the sidewalks going forward.

“Many of these bicyclists, or e-bicyclists, when it’s convenient to be on the sidewalk, they’re a pedestrian, and if they want to be in the flow of traffic, they’re on the street,” James said. “Somehow or another, we’re going to have to figure out how we’re going to address this going into the future.”

Additionally, to give out license plates to e-bikes as some members of the public suggested, it would require a significant administrative effort. James, Ward, and Duncan were in favor of the suggestion, with Duncan stating that the council could request staff to present a report on the feasibility of a registration program before an upcoming Bike Safety Rodeo.

Officially, the council introduced the ordinance amending the city’s municipal code relating to the use of bicycles, e-bikes and other activities on the pier, beach, beach access road and Beach Trail. At the council’s next meeting, it’s expected to formally adopt the ordinance.

C. Jayden Smith graduated from Dana Hills High in 2018 before pursuing a Bachelor’s degree in digital and broadcast journalism from the University of North Texas. After graduating in December 2020, he reported for the Salina Journal in Salina, Kansas. Jayden loves college football and bothering his black lab named Shadow.

Trustworthy, accurate and reliable local news stories are more important now than ever. Support our newsroom by making a contribution and becoming a subscribing member today.

About The Author Staff

comments (3)

  • Has council ever biked the trail ? Do they know some bought the e bike because of physical limitations and desire to access the other parts of the beach that are not ADA friendly . Does council understand the investment others made for a e-bike and how it powers thru the mash potato texture of the poorly designed trail. Has council counted bikes to pedestrians on the trail north of Metro link station and wondered why bikes out number ped’s . Or is this just a scam to fill beach parking lots for the income ? .All but the most powerful bikes should be allowed on the trail for the traffic and disabled relief e bikes provide plus hauling ones beach gear . The crown in the trail has everyone competing for the center away from skull crushing rocks and pointy plants! A high breed trail is possible . Or do we desire to jail 12 year old’s like adults with ladders on there trucks , I believe in fixing problems to expand freedoms not more abusive rent a cop laws whats your thoughts ?

  • I walk the SC beach trail often since I live nearby. I have been practically run over by e-bike riders going very fast. At the very least there should be a speed limit. Also, regular bikes are not allowed on the beach trail during summer months. I think that should include e-bikes too. No one is going to jail anyone for riding an e-bike. Bike riders currently get tickets for violations just like automobile drivers.

    Just because you bought an expensive e-bike does not give you the right to ride it anywhere. People who buy expensive automobiles can’t drive them in many areas.

  • So grateful that the City Council is moving in the direction of banning ebikes on the beach trail! I am an ebike owner and I agree they should be banned from the beach trail and all sidewalks. I can’t tell you how many times I’ve nearly been hit, injured, or killed by an ebike on the trail. Young people especially driving 20+ miles an hour carrying large surfboards can be lethal! And the city will be sued for damages, injuries, death, and punitive damages! It is sooooo dangerous to have ebikes, aka small motorcycles, on the same path as slow moving pedestrians! Get them off asap, to save lives and lawsuits! Thanks to all who voted for a safer community!

comments (3)

Your email address will not be published.

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>