SUPPORT THIS INDEPENDENT JOURNALISM
The article you’re about to read is from our reporters doing their important work — investigating, researching, and writing their stories. We want to provide informative and inspirational stories that connect you to the people, issues and opportunities within our community. Journalism requires lots of resources. Today, our business model has been interrupted by the pandemic; the vast majority of our advertisers’ businesses have been impacted. That’s why the SC Times is now turning to you for financial support. Learn more about our new Insider’s program here. Thank you.

Camp sites set up in open space areas in Rancho San Clemente have residents concerned about the potential for a homeless shelter in the area. Photo courtesy of Vonne Barnes.
Camp sites set up in open space areas in Rancho San Clemente have residents concerned about the potential for a homeless shelter in the area. Photo courtesy of Vonne Barnes.

By Jim Shilander

After several public hearing and an additional two hours of debate, the San Clemente Planning Commission ended up back where they started on the subject of zoning for a homeless shelter Wednesday.

The commission sent a proposal to allow for a shelter of up to 50 beds in the Calle de Industrias area behind Denny’s on Avenida Pico, as well as a 35-bed limit for the entire Rancho San Clemente Business Park to the City Council for consideration. The proposal also allows churches throughout the city to house up to six beds at a time.

Residents near the business park and business owners there protested that the values of their property and their investments would fall if potentially a shelter was placed in the park.

The city is obligated by Senate Bill 2 to create an area where a shelter can be approved by right. The city has determined that there are 65 to 70 permanent homeless in the city, though that number swells at points according the city and Orange County Sheriff’s Department personnel. If the city does not provide the zoning, its housing element would be considered incomplete.

Homeless advocates said the city could not afford to do nothing, as the homeless population was currently using hospital beds as a shelter, or staying in the open air, causing the potential fire hazard feared by business owners and RSC residents.

Ed Connor, a board member of the homeless advocacy organization iHOPE said the organization actually preferred the use of a one acre site off of Pico owned by the business park association, which the commission had disregarded at an earlier meeting.

A proposed compromise that would have limited the shelters to five church properties in both the Rancho San Clemente and Talega business parks, however, failed to receive majority support in a straw poll of the board.

Another optional proposal made by Commissioner Wayne Eggleston to allow a 25-bed shelter at Industrias and 10 beds for churches, which he admitted placed more of a burden on the religious institutions, was defeated 5-2. He said the other proposals put too much of a burden on too small of an area of the city.

“I think it’s up to the churches to step up,” Eggleston said. “And who knows, it may pass muster.”

Retiring principal planner Jeff Hook said that proposal was less likely to be approved by the state than the other options.

Commissioner Barton Crandell said the commission was “acting like a political body,” rather than making a strict decision on land use.

“I would prefer sending the less palatable option (the full rezoning of the business park, 50-beds in Calle de Industrias and six-bed church limit) to the City Council and let them pare it down,” Crandell said.

Chair Julia Darden, who had made the compromise proposal, said the final option was “not perfect” but was more likely to get state approval.

BECOME AN INSIDER TODAY
Trustworthy, accurate and reliable local news stories are more important now than ever. Support our newsroom by making a contribution and becoming a subscribing member today.

About The Author Staff

comments (2)

  • I live in Rancho San Clemente and saw some of my neighbors at the last hearing, united in their opposition of the RSC Business Park option. I greatly respect them and understand their objections, but, hey, we already live among the homeless. Shelters are a good first step in managing the problem, although many other steps are needed. I’m always surprised that people seem to think shelters and other assistance attracts more homeless and their problem behaviors.

    • I believe MS Ross misunderstood the comments of the residents and business leaders who spoke against placing the shelter in the RSC Business Park. They were not objecting to a shelter or helping the homeless in our community. These citizens were objecting to the rush to judgment that the planning commission did in approving the business park as site for a homeless shelter.

      The commission failed in its duty to fully examine other more practical sites for the shelters such as the reclamation area, which is city owned already and has ample space for the shelter. They also failed to recommend any sites in the downtown area. These two areas are close to where most of the homeless people live. The business is park is not.

comments (2)

Your email address will not be published.

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>