The article you’re about to read is from our reporters doing their important work — investigating, researching, and writing their stories. We want to provide informative and inspirational stories that connect you to the people, issues and opportunities within our community. Journalism requires lots of resources. Today, our business model has been interrupted by the pandemic; the vast majority of our advertisers’ businesses have been impacted. That’s why the SC Times is now turning to you for financial support. Learn more about our new Insider’s program here. Thank you.

UPDATE: The TCA Board of Directors voted unanimously Thursday, March 12 to further pursue the extension of Los Patrones Parkway—an arterial, untolled route—as part of the efforts to relieve South County traffic, formally removing the possibility of extending the 241 Toll Road through San Clemente.

Proposals to have a toll road run through San Clemente and San Juan Capistrano were formally put to rest on Thursday, March 12, as the Transportation Corridor Agencies’ Board of Directors voted unanimously in favor of pursuing the untolled route option referred to as Alternative 22.

The board’s approval will allow the TCA to move forward with the studying of a plan to have Los Patrones Parkway, the arterial county road that begins at Oso Parkway—where the 241 Toll Road now ends—extend past Rancho Mission Viejo down to Avenida La Pata, right up to the San Clemente city limit.

The plan, or Alternative 22 as it’s identified in the ongoing South County Traffic Relief Effort (SCTRE), was the most viable solution in terms of traffic relief and safety, Orange County Board Supervisor and Chairperson Lisa Bartlett, a director on the TCA board, said at the meeting.

The California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) and the TCA have been working on the Relief Effort, which contained many proposals, including some to extend the 241 through parts of San Clemente and San Juan in order to connect to Interstate 5.

“In looking at all of the alternatives early on, I didn’t like any of them. I didn’t think they were viable for a whole host of reasons,” said Bartlett, who in 2018 sponsored the Patrones extension plan. Alt. 22 is “going to allow for the greatest amount of traffic relief and safety in the event that we would need to evacuate.”

As part of Thursday’s approval, the TCA will collaborate with Caltrans and OCTA to advance plans of having the high occupancy vehicle (HOV) lane on the I-5 extend from Avenida Pico to the San Diego County line, as well as complete the project to widen Ortega Highway in San Juan Capistrano.

The collaboration will entail the agencies executing the Alt. 22 proposal and “conclude the Agency’s efforts to identify solutions for a southerly extension of the 241 Toll Road,” the agenda report on the subject states. 

One sticking point during the directors’ discussion leading up to the vote, however, was whether their approval of Alt. 22 will undoubtedly put an end to the 241 Toll Road.

“What is not clear, and I’m hoping we can make clear, is whether this concludes the south county traffic project,” San Clemente Councilmember and TCA Board Director Kathy Ward said. “That is what I am not clear on. It is not super clear in these reports. . . . We need to know that that is concluded.”

Michael Kraman, the TCA’s chief executive, pointed out that was the intent of the fifth recommendation listed in the agenda report.

“That’s clearly the intent. This has been 25 years we’ve been looking at this, and today marks the day that effort comes to an end,” Kraman said, referring to the TCA’s efforts to complete the 241 Toll Road.

Kraman also noted that the TCA board’s vote will revert Alt. 22 as a county-led project and out of the hands of Caltrans. The county, he said, “will be the lead agency moving forward.”

Bartlett had also touched on that point earlier in the discussion, stating that she’s been asked by several people who are concerned that the extension of Los Patrones will be “just the next phase of something else.”

Bartlett said the Los Patrones extension will remain a county road that ends at La Pata.

“This is it basically, and to have that terminus point at La Pata, it puts the communities at ease,” she said.

A screening summary of all of the alternatives in the SCTRE shows that an untolled Alt. 22 is estimated to be able to reduce vehicle hours per delay, or VHD, on I-5 by 3,270 hours and by 4,520 hours on all other roadways. A tolled Los Patrones is estimated to have reduced VHD on I-5 by 1,990 hours and 3,000 hours on the all other roads.

“We said from the beginning that we were committed to getting the right technical data and working with the public and working collaboratively with other agencies. . . .Today’s recommendation proves we did what we promised to do,” Kraman told the board.

Peggy Huang, a TCA board director and Yorba Linda city councilmember, also noted the differences between extending Los Patrones as an untolled road versus a tolled one.

 “The difference between tolled and untolled . . . untolled performed better,” Huang said. “So then there’s no reason for this agency to ever consider tolling Alt. 22.”

Per the board’s vote, TCA staff will be working with the county to come up with a project development plan for Alt. 22. TCA Board Director and Dana Point Councilmember Joe Muller proposed that the staff return to the board every 120 days with a progress report on that collaboration. The board voted in favor of Muller’s amendment.

Below is the original story posted March 11

By Shawn Raymundo

The board of directors for the Transportation Corridor Agencies will meet on Thursday, March, 12, when they’re scheduled to consider nixing any plans of running a toll road through San Clemente.

Last week, Assemblymember Bill Brough, who has staunchly opposed the TCA, having drafted measures to limit its authority, announced that the agencies will instead further pursue extending the new county arterial road, Los Patrones Parkway, down to the San Clemente city limit as part of the ongoing South County Traffic Relief Effort (SCTRE).

The extension, known as Alternative 22 in the SCTRE, would be an un-tolled road alignment plan that connects Los Patrones from Cow Camp Road in Rancho Mission Viejo to Avenida La Pata, running along the east side of the Prima Deschecha Landfill.

The California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) and the TCA have been working on the Relief Effort.

The SCTRE had included a series of proposed routes, including some to extend the 241 Toll Road through San Clemente and connect to Interstate 5—proposals that have drawn vehement rebuke from local residents.

The initial stages of the environmental process to study the proposed 241 Toll Road extensions through San Clemente and parts of San Juan Capistrano began in November, when Caltrans began to accept public comment and review of the SCTRE. The public-comment period closed on Feb. 10 after being open for 94 days.

The recommendation to pursue Alt. 22, the agenda report for the TCA’s Thursday meeting stated, was “based on the public input received as part of the project scoping phase and the preliminary technical data, such as the evaluation of traffic improvements, potential impacts to communities (right-of-way), (and) potential impacts to the natural or built environment.”

During a sit-down interview with the San Clemente Times, Sarah King, media relations manager for the TCA, further explained that the benefits of going with the un-tolled Los Patrones extension “blew out of the water the alternatives that would connect to the 5.”

“So, really, it was a no-brainer for us to move all of those alternatives for any further consideration,” she said.

According to a breakdown of how each alternative was screened, the un-tolled option for Alt. 22 is estimated to be able to reduce vehicle hours per delay, or VHD, on I-5 by 3,270 hours and by 4,520 hours on all other roadways.

In terms of public feedback, the screening summary noted that opposition was ranked as “low” for the un-tolled Alt. 22 proposal. Public opposition for the three proposed routes to extend the 241 through San Clemente was “high,” the summary showed.

Several members of the local community opposed to the Transportation Corridor Agencies’ proposals to extend the 241 Toll Road through San Clemente attended a Toll Road Town Hall at the community on Wednesday, Nov. 13. Photo: Shawn Raymundo

According to King, Caltrans received 1,650 comments during the scoping period for the Relief Effort. With the TCA going with Alt. 22, King said she’s hoping it shows the agencies “worked really closely with the community,” listened to the public’s concerns and took them seriously.

“I know at times it seemed liked a really challenging process to go through the public meetings and what have you, but having this go through this formal scoping phase and listening to that public input—I mean 1,600 comments is really overwhelming for a project—and their input helped what alternative we were able to provide our board of directors,” she said.

The city of San Clemente and the TCA have been entrenched in legal battle since 2017, when the city, along with a homeowners association, filed a lawsuit challenging the agencies’ 2016 settlement agreement with environmental agencies that thwarted the plan to extend the 241 south of San Clemente. 

A Riverside County judge in late January ruled against the city’s motion to stop the TCA from considering alternative 241-extension routes. In its lawsuit, the city has argued that any route extension connecting the 241 to the I-5 via San Clemente would go against the legislatively intended route of the toll road per the Streets and Highways Code section 541.

Riverside Superior Court Judge Daniel Ottolia, however, noted in his Jan. 28 ruling that the section of the law states: “Route 241 is from Route 5 south of San Clemente to Route 91 in the City of Anaheim.”

“There’s no requirement or language in the statute that the road bypass San Clemente or that it intersect Interstate 5 south of San Clemente,” the judge stated.

As of this posting, the city had not responded to SC Times’ request for comment on how its lawsuit will proceed in light of the Alt. 22 recommendation.

Oso Parkway, where the 241 Toll Road presently begins, will likely become the permanent start and finish of the tollway following a recent announcement by the Transportation Corridor Agencies. Photo: Fred Swegles

Brough, whose re-election hopes were dashed last week after coming fourth in the state’s Primary Election, recently introduced Assembly Bill 3331, which proposes to amend section 541 of the highways code in an effort to make it clear that the 241 cannot run through San Clemente.

The state lawmaker had previously introduced a bill to limit the TCA’s authority, preventing it from building new projects and incurring additional debt. The measure, AB 1273, died in committee back in January.

As part of the board meeting on Thursday, the TCA, King pointed out, will recommend collaborating with Caltrans and OCTA in order to execute the Alt. 22 proposal and “conclude the Agency’s efforts to identify solutions for a southerly extension of the 241 Toll Road.”

Such collaboration will entail advancing plans to have the high occupancy vehicle (HOV) lane on the I-5 extend from Avenida Pico to the San Diego County line, as well as complete the project to widen Ortega Highway in San Juan Capistrano.

“Well, based on the staff report our board on Thursday will be taking action on, which is their policy to accept that the only alternative to move forward is an un-tolled county road; in the most simplest way, yes,” King said when asked whether the Alt. 22 plan will rule out a toll road entirely.

King also noted that should the board vote to move ahead with Alt. 22, the proposal will still need to go through the environmental phase, which is likely to take up another two to three years and be followed by a design phase before construction.

“So, we’re looking at maybe another seven years out,” before completion, King said. “Seven years, that’s probably a little aggressive.”

The TCA’s board meeting is scheduled for 9:30 a.m. at its headquarters in Irvine. The board meeting will be live-streamed online. More information can be found at

SR_1Shawn Raymundo
Shawn Raymundo is the city editor for the San Clemente Times. He graduated from Arizona State University with a bachelor’s degree in Global Studies. Before joining Picket Fence Media, he worked as the government accountability reporter for the Pacific Daily News in the U.S. territory of Guam. Follow him on Twitter @ShawnzyTsunami and follow San Clemente Times @SCTimesNews.

Trustworthy, accurate and reliable local news stories are more important now than ever. Support our newsroom by making a contribution and becoming a subscribing member today.

About The Author Staff

comments (1)

  • This article does not mention the result of my comment at the board meeting. The word “formally” was added to the wording to what the board voted on. No. 5 states it “formally concludes” the project effort.

    What is the purpose for writing the article this way and not telling San Clemente residents what happened? The residents of this city were threatened with this alignment for four years and they did everything possible to stop it. Some residents had to move and sell their beloved home they intended to retire in because they did not want to live with this hanging over their head. There are many residents who would say this was not a process at all.

    I understand SC Times Reporter Raymundo did not live or work here, but this article is so slated to TCA it is a slap in the face to the residents of this city. You successfully quoted the PR machine of the toll road but you missed the boat on what is important to these residents — a fight to stop a toll road that TCA was hell bent on building.

    No quote from the city but you quote every person you could from TCA. That’s not San Clemente.

comments (1)

Your email address will not be published.

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>